<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LocoMon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.locomon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.locomon.com</link>
	<description>Jungle Jaguar Shape-shifts to LocoMon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Seven Points of Light Created by locomon</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/the-seven-points-of-light-created/comment-page-1/#comment-4533</link>
		<dc:creator>locomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 16:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?p=142#comment-4533</guid>
		<description>Wait a moment
A war did start
Had No Cause
But a Man did Start
50/50 Bush
Comes to POWER
Takes You To WAR
And YeeHaw
I Gots me a Cause
RIDE Em Cowboy
SHOOT Em HI
SHOOT Em Lo
And Sends in the Boys
To Blows Up the People
Sending Terror to Their Bones
And Revenge to Their Hearts
But Who Knows
Maybe It&#039;ll Get Me
Some More Cheap Oil

Yee Haw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a moment<br />
A war did start<br />
Had No Cause<br />
But a Man did Start<br />
50/50 Bush<br />
Comes to POWER<br />
Takes You To WAR<br />
And YeeHaw<br />
I Gots me a Cause<br />
RIDE Em Cowboy<br />
SHOOT Em HI<br />
SHOOT Em Lo<br />
And Sends in the Boys<br />
To Blows Up the People<br />
Sending Terror to Their Bones<br />
And Revenge to Their Hearts<br />
But Who Knows<br />
Maybe It&#8217;ll Get Me<br />
Some More Cheap Oil</p>
<p>Yee Haw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Learn Your History Tejas by Francisco Marcos-Marin</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/los-teichas-de-tejas/comment-page-1/#comment-2366</link>
		<dc:creator>Francisco Marcos-Marin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?p=473#comment-2366</guid>
		<description>This note contains many inaccuracies. The Comanche did not come to Texas until very late in history. The interpretation of the acquiescence of the Mexican government to the entry of the anglos is ridiculous, biased and has no historical foundation. The name of Texas comes most likely from a Caddoan word meaning &quot;friend, ally&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This note contains many inaccuracies. The Comanche did not come to Texas until very late in history. The interpretation of the acquiescence of the Mexican government to the entry of the anglos is ridiculous, biased and has no historical foundation. The name of Texas comes most likely from a Caddoan word meaning &#8220;friend, ally&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Este Es Mi Caballo Loco by Toby Lewandoski</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/este-es-mi-caballo-loco/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby Lewandoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?page_id=122#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on North and South Korea &#8211; Follow Diplomacy NOT WAR, Go Back to Table to Discuss Demarkation Lines by information technology</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/north-and-south-korea-follow-diplomacy-not-war-go-back-to-table-to-discuss-demarkation-lines/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>information technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 01:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?p=381#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stuff I LIKE by zakladanie akwariow morskich</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/238/comment-page-1/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>zakladanie akwariow morskich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?p=238#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent blog post. We have a similar blog site myself so I will retain coming again to examine a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent blog post. We have a similar blog site myself so I will retain coming again to examine a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on La Semilla de La Vida by DSi Games</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/t1/comment-page-1/#comment-1517</link>
		<dc:creator>DSi Games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?p=151#comment-1517</guid>
		<description>It appears that you have put a good amount of effort into your blog and this world require more of these on the Internet these days. The both of us actually enjoyed your post. I do not have a great deal to say in reply, I just wanted to sign up to reply well done.I always learn something new from your post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that you have put a good amount of effort into your blog and this world require more of these on the Internet these days. The both of us actually enjoyed your post. I do not have a great deal to say in reply, I just wanted to sign up to reply well done.I always learn something new from your post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on American Crusade by DRILL BABY DRILL</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/the-american-crusade/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>DRILL BABY DRILL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 00:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?page_id=308#comment-175</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what this is all about, isn&#039;t it? That one has more than the other? That the rights of Americans are being trampled on by powerless immigrants, while corporate greed ruins our coastlines.  How easy we forget NEPA, the National Environmental Policy Act, passed in 1969, signed into Law by Nixon in 1970.  That we are to pass this great nation of ours onto future generations in the same way we got it.  And now we&#039;re reminded what instigated that Law, the oil spill of California where Oil did the same thing there.   
From oil spill to environmental law

An oil spill off of the coast of Santa Barbara in 1969 decimated marine life.Image courtesy of USGS.

Have you ever heard of the Santa Barbara oil spill?

In January of 1969, an oil drilling platform six miles off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, suffered a blowout that resulted in a major ecological disaster as 3 million gallons of crude oil gushed into the Pacific Ocean and decimated marine life. The public outcry resulted in passage of numerous environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, which applies to everything that we do here at Fermilab. NEPA established a framework to insure that environmental factors receive the same consideration as others in decision making for activities involving federal funding, land or permits.

NEPA requires that a review of potential environmental consequences be conducted for proposed projects that fall under its guidelines, often referred to as a NEPA Review. Project managers at Fermilab and DOE are keenly aware that NEPA documentation must be finalized before a project can reach Critical Decision-2, one of five steps in the DOE project approval process.

Because of the extensive preparation time and resources involved, NEPA reviews should begin as soon as a project’s impact on the environment can be evaluated. Project managers and other laboratory staff can get guidance on how to conduct a NEPA review of a proposed action from procedures developed by DOE, NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021). For more information, please read NEPA NOTES, FESHM 8060, D/S/C procedures, or contact your D/S/C Environmental Officer or the author.

NEPA was the result of a very unfortunate event and of growing concerns about detrimental impacts on ecology, wildlife, and human health. Since then, it has helped us to protect the environment, strengthening Fermilab’s role as responsible steward of its site.

-- Teri Dykhius, ES&amp;H

1969 Oil Spill 
source: http://www.silcom.com/~sbwcn/spill.shtml (current as of 5/03)
On the afternoon of January 29, 1969, an environmental nightmare began in Santa Barbara, California. A Union Oil Co. platform stationed six miles off the coast of Summerland suffered a blowout. Oil workers had drilled a well down 3500 feet below the ocean floor. Riggers began to retrieve the pipe in order to replace a drill bit when the &quot;mud&quot; used to maintain pressure became dangerously low. A natural gas blowout occurred. An initial attempt to cap the hole was successful but led to a tremendous buildup of pressure. The expanding mass created five breaks in an east-west fault on the ocean floor, releasing oil and gas from deep beneath the earth.

For eleven days, oil workers struggled to cap the rupture. During that time, 200,000 gallons of crude oil bubbled to the surface and was spread into a 800 square mile slick by winds and swells. Incoming tides brought the thick tar to beaches from Rincon Point to Goleta, marring 35 miles of coastline. Beaches with off-shore kelp forests were spared the worst as kelp fronds kept most of the tar from coming ashore. The slick also moved south, tarring Anacapa Island&#039;s Frenchy&#039;s Cove and beaches on Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands.

Ecological Impact

Animals that depended on the sea were hard hit. Incoming tides brought the corpses of dead seals and dolphins. Oil had clogged the blowholes of the dolphins, causing massive lung hemorrhages. Animals that ingested the oil were poisoned. In the months that followed, gray whales migrating to their calving and breeding grounds in Baja California avoided the channel —their main route south.

The oil took its toll on the seabird population. Shorebirds like plovers, godwits and willets which feed on sand creatures fled the area. But diving birds which must get their nourishment from the waters themselves became soaked with tar.

The Santa Barbara Zoo was among three emergency bird treatment centers established during the disaster. Volunteers were recruited to pluck oiled birds from local beaches. Grebes, cormorants and other seabirds were so sick, their feathers so soaked in oil that they were not difficult to catch. Birds were bathed in Polycomplex A-11, medicated, and placed under heat lamps to stave off pneumonia. The survival rate was less than 30 percent for birds that were treated. Many more died on the beaches where they had formerly sought their livelihoods. Those who had managed to avoid the oil were threatened by the detergents used to disperse the oil slick. The chemicals robbed feathers of the natural waterproofing used to keep seabirds afloat.

In all 3686 birds were estimated to have died because of contact with oil. Aerial surveys a year later found only 200 grebes in an area that had 
previously drawn 4000 to 7000.

Cleanup Efforts

It took oil workers 11 1/2; days to control the leaking oil well. Workers pumped chemical mud down the 3500 foot shaft at a rate of 1500 barrels an hour. It was then topped by a cement plug. Residual amounts of gas continued to escape and another leak sprung up weeks later, releasing oil for months to follow.

Skimmers scooped up oil from the surface of the ocean. In the air, planes dumped detergents on the tar covered ocean in an attempt to break up the slick. On the beaches and harbors, straw was spread on oily patches of water and sand. The straw soaked up the black mess and was then raked up. Rocks were steamed cleaned, cooking marine life like limpets and mussels that attach themselves to coastal rocks.

What Went Wrong?

Union Oil&#039;s Platform A ruptured because of inadequate protective casing. The oil company had been given permission by the U.S. Geological Survey to cut corners and operate the platform with casings below federal and California standards. Investigators would later determine that more steel pipe sheating inside the drilling hole would have prevented the rupture.

Because the oil rig was beyond California&#039;s three-mile coastal zone, the rig did not have to comply with state standards. At the time, California drilling regulations were far more rigid those implied by the federal government.

Aftermath

In the spring following the oil spill, Earth Day was born nationwide. Many consider the publicity surrounding the oil spill a major impetus to the environmental movement.

Only days after the spill began, Get Oil Out (GOO) was founded in Santa Barbara. Founder Bud Bottoms urged the public to cut down on driving, burn oil company credit cards and boycott gas stations associated with offshore drilling companies. Volunteers helped the organization gather 100,000 signatures on a petition banning offshore oil drilling. While drilling was only halted temporarily, laws were passed to strengthen offshore drilling regulations. Union Oil suffered millions in losses from the clean-up efforts, payments to fishermen and local businesses, and lawsuit settlements. But maybe worse, the reputation of the oil industry was forever tarnished.

In Their Own Words . . .

Nature writer John McKinney: 
&quot;I had been impressed by the way energetic college students, shopkeepers, surfers, parents with their kids, all joined the beach clean-up. I saw a Montecito society matron transporting oily birds in her Mercedes.&quot;  McKinney witnessed the event firsthand as a volunteer who rescued oiled birds. A chapter of his book A Walk Along Land&#039;s End describes his experience.

Fred L. Hartley, president of Union Oil Co.: 
&quot;I don&#039;t like to call it a disaster,&quot; because there has been no loss of human life. 
&quot;I am amazed at the publicity for the loss of a few birds.&quot;

Santa Barbara NewsPress Editor Thomas Storke: 
&quot;Never in my long lifetime have I ever seen such an aroused populace at the grassroots level. This oil pollution has done something I have never seen before in Santa Barbara – it has united citizens of all political persuasions in a truly nonpartisan cause.&quot;

U.S. President Richard Nixon: 
&quot;It is sad that it was necessary that Santa Barbara should be the example that had to bring it to the attention of the American people. What is involved is the use of our resources of the sea and of the land in a more effective way and with more concern for preserving the beauty and the natural resources that are so important to any kind of society that we want for the future. The Santa Barbara incident has frankly touched the conscience of the American people.&quot; 
  
 

Many credit the 1969 oil spill with igniting the environmental movement. For eleven days, 200,000 gallons of crude oil spilled into the channel from a disabled oil rig. In the aftermath, 3600 birds were dead along with ten seals and dolphins and countless fish and marine invertebrates.

In 1994, 37 marine oil spills were reported in the county. In addition, natural oil seepages in the ocean ensnare many migratory birds. Last year, the network treated 47 oiled birds.

 
 

GOO! (Get Oil Out) 
started in 69 (SB grassroots environ. group)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what this is all about, isn&#8217;t it? That one has more than the other? That the rights of Americans are being trampled on by powerless immigrants, while corporate greed ruins our coastlines.  How easy we forget NEPA, the National Environmental Policy Act, passed in 1969, signed into Law by Nixon in 1970.  That we are to pass this great nation of ours onto future generations in the same way we got it.  And now we&#8217;re reminded what instigated that Law, the oil spill of California where Oil did the same thing there.<br />
From oil spill to environmental law</p>
<p>An oil spill off of the coast of Santa Barbara in 1969 decimated marine life.Image courtesy of USGS.</p>
<p>Have you ever heard of the Santa Barbara oil spill?</p>
<p>In January of 1969, an oil drilling platform six miles off the coast of Santa Barbara, California, suffered a blowout that resulted in a major ecological disaster as 3 million gallons of crude oil gushed into the Pacific Ocean and decimated marine life. The public outcry resulted in passage of numerous environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, which applies to everything that we do here at Fermilab. NEPA established a framework to insure that environmental factors receive the same consideration as others in decision making for activities involving federal funding, land or permits.</p>
<p>NEPA requires that a review of potential environmental consequences be conducted for proposed projects that fall under its guidelines, often referred to as a NEPA Review. Project managers at Fermilab and DOE are keenly aware that NEPA documentation must be finalized before a project can reach Critical Decision-2, one of five steps in the DOE project approval process.</p>
<p>Because of the extensive preparation time and resources involved, NEPA reviews should begin as soon as a project’s impact on the environment can be evaluated. Project managers and other laboratory staff can get guidance on how to conduct a NEPA review of a proposed action from procedures developed by DOE, NEPA Implementing Procedures (10 CFR Part 1021). For more information, please read NEPA NOTES, FESHM 8060, D/S/C procedures, or contact your D/S/C Environmental Officer or the author.</p>
<p>NEPA was the result of a very unfortunate event and of growing concerns about detrimental impacts on ecology, wildlife, and human health. Since then, it has helped us to protect the environment, strengthening Fermilab’s role as responsible steward of its site.</p>
<p>&#8211; Teri Dykhius, ES&#038;H</p>
<p>1969 Oil Spill<br />
source: <a href="http://www.silcom.com/~sbwcn/spill.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.silcom.com/~sbwcn/spill.shtml</a> (current as of 5/03)<br />
On the afternoon of January 29, 1969, an environmental nightmare began in Santa Barbara, California. A Union Oil Co. platform stationed six miles off the coast of Summerland suffered a blowout. Oil workers had drilled a well down 3500 feet below the ocean floor. Riggers began to retrieve the pipe in order to replace a drill bit when the &#8220;mud&#8221; used to maintain pressure became dangerously low. A natural gas blowout occurred. An initial attempt to cap the hole was successful but led to a tremendous buildup of pressure. The expanding mass created five breaks in an east-west fault on the ocean floor, releasing oil and gas from deep beneath the earth.</p>
<p>For eleven days, oil workers struggled to cap the rupture. During that time, 200,000 gallons of crude oil bubbled to the surface and was spread into a 800 square mile slick by winds and swells. Incoming tides brought the thick tar to beaches from Rincon Point to Goleta, marring 35 miles of coastline. Beaches with off-shore kelp forests were spared the worst as kelp fronds kept most of the tar from coming ashore. The slick also moved south, tarring Anacapa Island&#8217;s Frenchy&#8217;s Cove and beaches on Santa Cruz, Santa Rosa and San Miguel Islands.</p>
<p>Ecological Impact</p>
<p>Animals that depended on the sea were hard hit. Incoming tides brought the corpses of dead seals and dolphins. Oil had clogged the blowholes of the dolphins, causing massive lung hemorrhages. Animals that ingested the oil were poisoned. In the months that followed, gray whales migrating to their calving and breeding grounds in Baja California avoided the channel —their main route south.</p>
<p>The oil took its toll on the seabird population. Shorebirds like plovers, godwits and willets which feed on sand creatures fled the area. But diving birds which must get their nourishment from the waters themselves became soaked with tar.</p>
<p>The Santa Barbara Zoo was among three emergency bird treatment centers established during the disaster. Volunteers were recruited to pluck oiled birds from local beaches. Grebes, cormorants and other seabirds were so sick, their feathers so soaked in oil that they were not difficult to catch. Birds were bathed in Polycomplex A-11, medicated, and placed under heat lamps to stave off pneumonia. The survival rate was less than 30 percent for birds that were treated. Many more died on the beaches where they had formerly sought their livelihoods. Those who had managed to avoid the oil were threatened by the detergents used to disperse the oil slick. The chemicals robbed feathers of the natural waterproofing used to keep seabirds afloat.</p>
<p>In all 3686 birds were estimated to have died because of contact with oil. Aerial surveys a year later found only 200 grebes in an area that had<br />
previously drawn 4000 to 7000.</p>
<p>Cleanup Efforts</p>
<p>It took oil workers 11 1/2; days to control the leaking oil well. Workers pumped chemical mud down the 3500 foot shaft at a rate of 1500 barrels an hour. It was then topped by a cement plug. Residual amounts of gas continued to escape and another leak sprung up weeks later, releasing oil for months to follow.</p>
<p>Skimmers scooped up oil from the surface of the ocean. In the air, planes dumped detergents on the tar covered ocean in an attempt to break up the slick. On the beaches and harbors, straw was spread on oily patches of water and sand. The straw soaked up the black mess and was then raked up. Rocks were steamed cleaned, cooking marine life like limpets and mussels that attach themselves to coastal rocks.</p>
<p>What Went Wrong?</p>
<p>Union Oil&#8217;s Platform A ruptured because of inadequate protective casing. The oil company had been given permission by the U.S. Geological Survey to cut corners and operate the platform with casings below federal and California standards. Investigators would later determine that more steel pipe sheating inside the drilling hole would have prevented the rupture.</p>
<p>Because the oil rig was beyond California&#8217;s three-mile coastal zone, the rig did not have to comply with state standards. At the time, California drilling regulations were far more rigid those implied by the federal government.</p>
<p>Aftermath</p>
<p>In the spring following the oil spill, Earth Day was born nationwide. Many consider the publicity surrounding the oil spill a major impetus to the environmental movement.</p>
<p>Only days after the spill began, Get Oil Out (GOO) was founded in Santa Barbara. Founder Bud Bottoms urged the public to cut down on driving, burn oil company credit cards and boycott gas stations associated with offshore drilling companies. Volunteers helped the organization gather 100,000 signatures on a petition banning offshore oil drilling. While drilling was only halted temporarily, laws were passed to strengthen offshore drilling regulations. Union Oil suffered millions in losses from the clean-up efforts, payments to fishermen and local businesses, and lawsuit settlements. But maybe worse, the reputation of the oil industry was forever tarnished.</p>
<p>In Their Own Words . . .</p>
<p>Nature writer John McKinney:<br />
&#8220;I had been impressed by the way energetic college students, shopkeepers, surfers, parents with their kids, all joined the beach clean-up. I saw a Montecito society matron transporting oily birds in her Mercedes.&#8221;  McKinney witnessed the event firsthand as a volunteer who rescued oiled birds. A chapter of his book A Walk Along Land&#8217;s End describes his experience.</p>
<p>Fred L. Hartley, president of Union Oil Co.:<br />
&#8220;I don&#8217;t like to call it a disaster,&#8221; because there has been no loss of human life.<br />
&#8220;I am amazed at the publicity for the loss of a few birds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Santa Barbara NewsPress Editor Thomas Storke:<br />
&#8220;Never in my long lifetime have I ever seen such an aroused populace at the grassroots level. This oil pollution has done something I have never seen before in Santa Barbara – it has united citizens of all political persuasions in a truly nonpartisan cause.&#8221;</p>
<p>U.S. President Richard Nixon:<br />
&#8220;It is sad that it was necessary that Santa Barbara should be the example that had to bring it to the attention of the American people. What is involved is the use of our resources of the sea and of the land in a more effective way and with more concern for preserving the beauty and the natural resources that are so important to any kind of society that we want for the future. The Santa Barbara incident has frankly touched the conscience of the American people.&#8221; </p>
<p>Many credit the 1969 oil spill with igniting the environmental movement. For eleven days, 200,000 gallons of crude oil spilled into the channel from a disabled oil rig. In the aftermath, 3600 birds were dead along with ten seals and dolphins and countless fish and marine invertebrates.</p>
<p>In 1994, 37 marine oil spills were reported in the county. In addition, natural oil seepages in the ocean ensnare many migratory birds. Last year, the network treated 47 oiled birds.</p>
<p>GOO! (Get Oil Out)<br />
started in 69 (SB grassroots environ. group)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yo Soy Chicano, Ese! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.locomon.com/yo-no-soy-hispano-ni-latino/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.locomon.com/?page_id=278#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Your notion of history is very skewed, here&#039;s why.
  First, you define Latin as a Roman experience. Then,
  you go and define the Hispanic experience as something
  tied to languages spoken in Spain. Further, you generalize
  by saying that &quot;we&quot; are all Latinos due to some Latin
  implantation that came across the Atlantic Ocean and
  miscegenated with all the natives here in America.
  I think you&#039;ve been reading too many romance novels. Or
  maybe you truly believe this nice and cute package of
  history that you&#039;ve managed to make fit for yourself.
  But the truth is, it&#039;s not the truth!
  The reality is that since contact with whites there have been
  over 2,200 First Nations on Aztlan, or what you call America.
  Your perspective about them is the same hegemony that resounds
  and is fed throughout the walls of academia, and that is,
  that First Nations have been abolished and/or transformed into
  something white. And why? Because we use the language
  of the colonizer? If this is true, then everyone in the USA
  should be calling themselves English. I know the Census Bureau
  would love that, but racism doesn&#039;t work this way. I will show
  you.
  When the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed in 1848 it ended
  (and in many ways began) the US-Mexican war. But President Polk
  was angry at Secretary Triste for signing it. They wanted the
  whole of Mexico, and that&#039;s why he was called back to Washington
  to answer for this transience. But when ratification went
  before the floor of congress they decided against the taking of
  the whole of Mexico because it meant taking in too many &quot;hostile
  savages&quot; into their paradigm of a pure white US of A.
  And it is here, Praxidis, that I sincerely believe that you find
  it safer and more comfortable to define yourself within a white
  European parameter of definition. But then you go further, and you
  try to superimpose this circle on Chicanos. Chicanos are not
  searching for self nor acceptance from an outsider. We know who
  we are, where we&#039;re from and where we&#039;re going. We are from the
  red road we call Aztlan and we are damn proud of it, brother. And
  maybe you think you are protecting us or something by calling us
  through a white way, but in essence, you are not!
  I actually feel sorry for you, and not because of your
  &quot;wannabe white at any cost&quot; mentality, which is mostly
  shared across most layers of &quot;hispanic/latino&quot; leadership,
  but because of the legacy that you set by making this
  erasure possible. Being an invisible people by tagging
  our blood to be Latino/Hispano, defiles and insults my
  Chicano ancestors. They fought hard and died by the many
  in order to protect this land, before, after and during the white&#039;s
  occupation of it, and I will always remember that. And
  forgetting it is a curse that I can live without. Think
  about it, passing our future generations smog, polluted waters
  and lifeless landscapes, that is something a white writes a
  law about to prevent, but still does it. First Nation
  people feel Aztlan, and will fight to protect it, so don&#039;t
  get scared, apologize nor minimize my blood, it is
  in my nature to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your notion of history is very skewed, here&#8217;s why.<br />
  First, you define Latin as a Roman experience. Then,<br />
  you go and define the Hispanic experience as something<br />
  tied to languages spoken in Spain. Further, you generalize<br />
  by saying that &#8220;we&#8221; are all Latinos due to some Latin<br />
  implantation that came across the Atlantic Ocean and<br />
  miscegenated with all the natives here in America.<br />
  I think you&#8217;ve been reading too many romance novels. Or<br />
  maybe you truly believe this nice and cute package of<br />
  history that you&#8217;ve managed to make fit for yourself.<br />
  But the truth is, it&#8217;s not the truth!<br />
  The reality is that since contact with whites there have been<br />
  over 2,200 First Nations on Aztlan, or what you call America.<br />
  Your perspective about them is the same hegemony that resounds<br />
  and is fed throughout the walls of academia, and that is,<br />
  that First Nations have been abolished and/or transformed into<br />
  something white. And why? Because we use the language<br />
  of the colonizer? If this is true, then everyone in the USA<br />
  should be calling themselves English. I know the Census Bureau<br />
  would love that, but racism doesn&#8217;t work this way. I will show<br />
  you.<br />
  When the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed in 1848 it ended<br />
  (and in many ways began) the US-Mexican war. But President Polk<br />
  was angry at Secretary Triste for signing it. They wanted the<br />
  whole of Mexico, and that&#8217;s why he was called back to Washington<br />
  to answer for this transience. But when ratification went<br />
  before the floor of congress they decided against the taking of<br />
  the whole of Mexico because it meant taking in too many &#8220;hostile<br />
  savages&#8221; into their paradigm of a pure white US of A.<br />
  And it is here, Praxidis, that I sincerely believe that you find<br />
  it safer and more comfortable to define yourself within a white<br />
  European parameter of definition. But then you go further, and you<br />
  try to superimpose this circle on Chicanos. Chicanos are not<br />
  searching for self nor acceptance from an outsider. We know who<br />
  we are, where we&#8217;re from and where we&#8217;re going. We are from the<br />
  red road we call Aztlan and we are damn proud of it, brother. And<br />
  maybe you think you are protecting us or something by calling us<br />
  through a white way, but in essence, you are not!<br />
  I actually feel sorry for you, and not because of your<br />
  &#8220;wannabe white at any cost&#8221; mentality, which is mostly<br />
  shared across most layers of &#8220;hispanic/latino&#8221; leadership,<br />
  but because of the legacy that you set by making this<br />
  erasure possible. Being an invisible people by tagging<br />
  our blood to be Latino/Hispano, defiles and insults my<br />
  Chicano ancestors. They fought hard and died by the many<br />
  in order to protect this land, before, after and during the white&#8217;s<br />
  occupation of it, and I will always remember that. And<br />
  forgetting it is a curse that I can live without. Think<br />
  about it, passing our future generations smog, polluted waters<br />
  and lifeless landscapes, that is something a white writes a<br />
  law about to prevent, but still does it. First Nation<br />
  people feel Aztlan, and will fight to protect it, so don&#8217;t<br />
  get scared, apologize nor minimize my blood, it is<br />
  in my nature to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

